Green New Deal 2009
Dec 17th, 2008 | By Jesse Fox | Category: Featured Articles
3 green, transit-based stimulus plans.
Change is definitely in the air these days. President-elect Obama is putting together his plans for some sort of New Deal-like program, which he has said will include massive investments in building public institutions like schools, renewable energy and infrastructure.
Meanwhile, advocates for all sorts of policies are busy putting together their own proposals for the new administration in Washington. And with everyone from Wall Street traders to Detroit car makers bombarding the government with bailout requests, now just might be the time to get some new ideas into the discourse.
Andy Kunz, www.urbandesign.org
I interviewed Andy Kunz almost a year ago about his plan for a nationwide, three-tiered train system to link up the nation’s major urban centers. The centerpiece of his plan involves creating a network of high-speed trains as a sustainable alternative to air and road travel. Kunz’s updated plan, which he calls New Deal 2009, is based on high-speed rail networks in Europe and Asia.
Kunz points to five major crises: the collapsing economy and job losses, global warming and climate change, peak oil and energy security, crumbling infrastructure and a nationwide mobility crisis. The solution to all five of these major problems, according to Kunz, is a world-class rail system, which Kunz calls “a real bargain,” considering the alternatives.
Read more about Kunz’s plan here.
The Apollo Alliance
A long-time advocate for green collar jobs in America, the Apollo Alliance describes itself as “a coalition of business, labor, environmental, and community leaders working to catalyze a clean energy revolution in America to reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign oil, cut the carbon emissions that are destabilizing our climate, and expand opportunities for American businesses and workers.”
Transit plays a prominent role in the Alliance’s 10-year, $500 billion plan to create 5 million new jobs. Among their proposals: bringing government investment in mass transit at least up to par with investments in highways, increasing the government’s share of funding for transit and infrastructure projects and prioritizing repair and maintenance of infrastructure over new highways.
In stating its case, the Apollo Alliance quotes James S. Simpson, the Federal Transit Administration Administrator:
“The “value proposition” for transit has never been greater. Ridership is at its highest level since late 1950s – with over 10 billion trips taken in the U.S. last year. Every $1 invested in public transportation projects generates $6 in local economic activity. And transit saves the nation almost 4 million gallons of gasoline a day and drastically reduces carbon dioxide emissions.”
Read the Apollo Alliance’s program here. Read more about what they have to say about investment in mass transit here and here.
Transportation for America
A nationwide coalition of organizations, Transportation for America is also calling for a a revamped system of transportation in America, including federal help in retrofitting unsafe urban roads, complete streets for cars, cyclists and pedestrians, more local and democratic decision-making and using transport to create affordable housing and jobs (they are talking about over 20 million new jobs in building new infrastructure and repairing the old).
As proof that Americans support investments in better public transportation, the group points to 23 new transport-related initiatives, approved on Election Day, that will invest a total of $75 billion in transit projects across the country, such as California’s Proposition 1A high-speed rail project and LA’s Measure R.
So how receptive will the new administration in Washington be to these kinds of ideas come January 20? Here is an except of a letter the Obama campaign sent Transportation for America back in October:
“I support Amtrak funding and the development of high-speed freight and passenger rail networks across the country… I will also re-commit federal resources to public mass transportation projects across the country. I’ve worked to improve transportation access to jobs for people with lower incomes since my time in the Illinois State Senate, and I will continue this work as President. And I will further promote transit by creating incentives for transit usage that are equal to the current incentives for driving… Everyone benefits if we can leave our cars, walk, bicycle and access other transportation alternatives. I agree that we can stop wasteful spending and save Americans money, and as president, I will re- evaluate the transportation funding process to ensure that smart growth considerations are taken into account.”
Originally posted on TreeHugger.com on November 29 2008. Image via apolloalliance.org.
![[Digg]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Newsvine]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/newsvine.png)
![[Reddit]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://www.sustainablecityblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
The War To Save Our Planet and Save Our Economy
With the government now in the banking and auto business, why not the energy business? We know the war business.
My background has included developing hydrogen fuel cell systems for the chalanging Apollo program. Now, over 30 years later, GM and other car manufactures around the world have developed hydrogen automobiles with refined hydrogen fuel cell power plants. The only waste byproducts from these “green” cars is water. The giant chalange here is we need massive amounts of hydrogen to run them at a reasonable cost of production and distribution. My vision is for our government to build an “energy fleet” consisting of ships that would travel the world producing and selling hydrogen. Selling energy to foreign markets instead of buying it like we do now. Germany is now undertaking this idea using wind power on board ships.
In my vision, the hydrogen is produced from sea water using state of the art high temperature nuclear reactors cooled by sea water. On board production is done far out to sea away from population centers and sensitive eco systems. This relatively newly developed technology can produce energy to run our cars with the cost efficiency close to that of oil. This newer method described above could bring costs for production and distribution under $3 a gallon equivalent. The fuel cell powered cars do not depend on large expensive batteries as do current electric automobiles.
Think of all the people we could put to work building this energy fleet of ships and the hydrogen powered automobiles. And put this investment back into our treasury from the proceeds coming from foreign trade. Selling stock in the government, i.e.. treasury bonds, like we did so well during the second world war, could help fund this program. Remember the Liberty ships? The US built over 2700 ships in four years to support the war effort. Now we have a greater war to win, not save our liberty, but to save our planet and our economy. Even with all the projects Rosevelt started to bring us out of depression, it took the Second World War effort to bring prosperity back to our country.
adrian@FloSkis.com
Nice writing. You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.
Allen Taylor
Thanks for good post